This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar


Dull, but important

Yesterday I was speaking at an event in Portsmouth. The subject was Brexit, naturally, but with a mix of activists and academics.

One theme that came up was a view from a former UKIP councillor to the effect that’ things could be worked out’ on the future relationship.

We did pick this up after the event and everyone agreed that much of what Brexit involves is highly technical and not very exciting, but still very important. “The devil’s in the detail” was the ex-councillor’s parting word.

Which prompts some reflection.

Firstly, the opening sentiment – “something’ll be worked out” – is a common one. It taps not only into lay models of ‘how things happen in politics’, but also into the more general uninterest in ‘how things happen in politics’.

As an exhibit, we might note how opinion polling suggests that the British public don’t think much of anyone in the Brexit negotiations, but that doesn’t change the broad balance of their preferences on leaving the EU. The decision is made, so ‘they’ should just get on with it.

Media tropes of Brexit as a ‘divorce’ also play into the view of ‘how difficult can it be?’ Sure, it’s countries, not people, but the principle’s the same, right?

To give a different example I’ve heard this week, someone told me how a friend of theirs was a trade dispute arbitrator, who could sort out cases in a month or two, and that’s basically what Brexit is.

I give these examples not to mock, but rather to bemoan the quality of debate that happens all too often. In the cases I mention, these were people both interested and widely-read on the matter, still slipping back into comfortable phrases that don’t stand much inspection.

And I say this as someone still finding areas of Brexit where I’m all too conscious of the limits to my understanding. One-eyed men, kings, and all the rest.

But there’s another level to this that occurs.

Who is doing this ‘working out’? Well, ‘them’.

Given how much ink has been spilled on the end of ‘experts’, it might seem odd that these same should now get on with it.

Much of this comes down to the inconsistency of individuals’ views, but it also points us to the dangers of weakening societal trust.

Brexit will be long and difficult to bring to anything like completion, and it will inevitably leave sections of society unhappy and disillusioned. Without strong underlying bonds of trust in place, it will be relatively easy for these people to claim that the system has failed them, further weakening what trust that remains.

This isn’t inevitable, but it requires all involved to speak frankly and fully about what is planned and what is possible: Brexit is a problem to be solved, not a weapon to be wielded.

This does happen, in places. May’s Mansion House speech had the merit of starting to map out the trade-offs that Brexit will involve, even if it didn’t offer ways through this.

But it also points to the importance of each of us, as citizens, making sure that they we understand enough to be able to take part in collective debates and decision-making.

That’s (often) dull, but it’s vital to the health of our democracy, founded as it is on the bedrock of participation. As I’ve noted before, if you don’t make decisions for yourself, then others will do it for you.


Recent Articles

Why cake is going to stay on the Brexit menu

Published on by | No Comments

The optimistic view of the round of speeches over the past weeks that culminated in Theresa May’s contribution at Mansion House is that the UK is finally confronting the consequences of the EU referendum. With both government ministers and Jeremy Corbyn devoting time to discussing and debating in more detail, this might be the point […]

Nothing has changed

Published on by and | No Comments

A good rule of thumb is that when you’re in a hole, you stop digging. Unless, of course, you’re in the tunnelling business. The British government is very much not in that line of work – such things being outsourced – so the rule would seem to apply in spades. And yet is spades that […]

Can you tell what it is yet?

Published on by and | No Comments

As a child, I used to like watching a TV programme where a bearded Australian would talk about some cartoons that he was going to show, hurriedly sketching a character in some dynamic pose. Part of the fun was the way he caught the characters’ essence: distilling them into a single image. Of course, this […]

Nothing is agreed

Published on by and | No Comments

I think I’ve discovered a new condition. I’m calling it Maioaviophobia, or a fear of Theresa May getting on a plane. Somehow, it’s taken until now to notice that it’s the flights that seem to produce the most erratic political behaviour from the Prime Minister. Just think back to that walking holiday last Easter, or […]

Tightening Le Touquet and the second-order effects of Brexit

Published on by and | Comments Off on Tightening Le Touquet and the second-order effects of Brexit

Today’s visit to London by President Macron is important on a number of levels, not least for triggering the long-overdue debate about whether King Harold would have been a Brexiter. If the loaning of the Bayeux Tapestry is something of a sideshow, then it also speaks the overly febrile nature of British political debate that this was […]

Despite Brexit not happening yet

Published on by and | Comments Off on Despite Brexit not happening yet

It’s not often I recommend a bot to follow, but I find that HaveWeLeft is a useful daily reminder: In all the talk of Brexit and transitions and new relationships, it’s easy to forget that the UK remains a full member state of the EU and will continue to be so for at least another 14 months. My personal […]

An arrested transition?

Published on by and | Comments Off on An arrested transition?

The great thing about the Christmas period is that pretty much everyone goes on leave, so we can all get some distance from work. That’s been true of the Article 50 process as much as anything else: a flurry of activity to book in some final bits under “work done in 2017”, before mince pies, […]

On being open (or closed)

Published on by and | Comments Off on On being open (or closed)

As we await the verdict of tomorrow’s European Council on the move to Phase 2, it’s perhaps useful to reflect on the decision-making style of Theresa May. Last night provided a vivid illustration of this, with the amendment to the Withdrawal Bill, which provides Parliament with a vote on the final deal. We might discuss on another […]

Unbelievable! The no-deal option’s lack of credibility

Published on by and | Comments Off on Unbelievable! The no-deal option’s lack of credibility

In my house, “rock’n’roll” has a very specific meaning. When uttered in the context of getting people out of the house it denotes that we have arrived at the actual moment of departure and no more delays will be tolerated: everyone is moving to the door.* Put differently, I have established a credible set of […]

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.